INDEPTH Network
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Logo
    • Home
    • What is this?
    • How to use it?
    • History
    • Data
    • Citations
    • News
    • INDEPTHStats
    • Acknowledgements
    • Feedback


    Kenya - Nairobi INDEPTH Core Dataset 2002-2012 Release 2015

    Africa-2015
    Reference ID INDEPTH.KE031.CMD2012.v1
    Year 2002
    Country Kenya
    Producer(s) Dr.Alex Ezeh - Site Leader, KE031
    Dr.Donatien Beguy - Site Representative, KE031
    Sponsor(s) Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA - - Current Funder
    William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, USA - - Current Funder
    Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency - - Current Funder
    Wellcome Trust, UK - - Previous Funder
    Rock
    Collection(s)
    Africa Region – Release 2015
    Metadata PDF Documentation in PDF
    Created on
    Jun 30, 2015
    Last modified
    Jul 27, 2015
    Page views
    71846
    • Study Description
    • Data Dictionary
    • Get Microdata
    • Overview
    • Sampling
    • Data Collection
    • Access policy
    • Export Metadata
    Sampling
    Sampling Procedure

    This dataset is related to the whole demographic surveillance area population. The number of respondents has varied over the last 10 years (2002-2012), with variations being observed at both household level and at Individual level. As at 31st December,2012 81,863 were being observed under the Nairobi HDSS living in 32,194 households distributed across two informal settlements(Korogocho and Viwandani). The variable IndividualId uniquely identifies every respondent observed while the variable LocationId uniquely identifies the room in which the individual was living at any point in time. To identify individuals who were living together at any one point in time (a household) the data can be split on location and observation dates.

    Deviations from Sample Design

    None

    Response Rate

    Over the years the response rate at household level has varied between 95% and 97% with response rate at Individual Level varying between 92% and 95%. Challenges to acheiving a 100% response rate have included:

    1. High Population Mobility within the study area
    2. High Population Attrition
    3. Respondent Fatigue
    4. Security in some areas

    Weighting

    Not applicable


      Logo
    Logo

    ©2013 INDEPTH Network, All Rights Reserved